Difference between genocide and ethnic cleansing
Genocide vs ethnic cleansing:
Throughout history, genocide and ethnic cleansing incidents have been instrumental for the many catastrophic incidents which took place on the face of the earth, ending the lives of many through unspeakable means while scarring the lives of the rest who survived. Both genocide and ethnic cleansing involve the mass slaughter of people in cold blood and therefore, because of the blatant similarity of these two words, genocide and ethnic cleansing tend to be confused with each other quite so often. However similar these two words may be, ethnic cleansing and genocide are two different terms which stand for completely different phenomena of which the differences are yet to be explored within the course of this article.
A definite, clear cut definition for genocide has not been discovered as yet in the world. However, genocide can be loosely defined as the killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting harm on the conditions of life, calculating to bring about the physical destruction, imposing measures that are intended to prevent births within a specific group of people with the intention of destroying in whole or partly a specific national, ethnic, religious or a racial group that lives in any part of the world. However, in order to be identified as a crime, a specific intent must be proven.
About ethnic cleansing
Ethnic cleansing can be defined as the intentional, systematic attempt of a certain political, religious or a social group to remove another social, political, religious or an ethnic group from a certain area, country or state through violent and terror-inspiring means. This could be done either by the forced removal of certain groups, killings and even intimidating a certain ethnic group to migrate or flee the area from terror. Other popular means of ethnic cleansing can be stated as torture, arbitrary arrest, execution, assault, rape, forcible eviction, loot and arson, destruction of property and such forceful means which induce fear in people. Ethnic cleansing is done so with the aim of creating a more homogenous population within a specific area.
What is the difference between ethnic cleansing and genocide?
While in some cases ethnic cleansing and genocide go hand in hand, these are two different terms which cannot be used as synonyms. However, both ethnic cleansing and genocide have their roots in deep hatred, jealousy and the greed for power and they both involve the systematic eradication of one ethnic group by another. But the main difference between the two words would be the fact that while genocide involves the mass killing of large populations directly, ethnic cleansing deals more with the removal of a certain religious, socio-political or an ethnic group from a certain geographic area.
And yet there are instances when these two terms come together. The holocaust led by Adolf Hitler during the World War II in Nazi Germany when the brutal slaughter of the Jewish population managed to terrorize Jews around the globe can be categorized under ethnic cleansing as by doing so, the Nazis attempted to thus create a homogenous land free of Jews. However, this cleansing process also involved the mass murder of over six million Jews, which in turn qualifies this incident as genocide as well. A more recent case which falls under these two categories would be the brutal killing of over 80000 Tutsi people by the Hutu tribe in Rwanda where a homogenous society was attempted to be had by way of cold blooded murder. Therefore, while it is extremely confusing to define these two words clearly, genocide and ethnic cleansing should not be confused with each other as they cannot, by any means, be used together as synonyms.
No related differences.
Tags: annihilation, assassination, bloodbath, bloodshed, butchery, carnage, decimation, ethnic cleansing, extermination, genocide, holocaust, internecion, mass execution, massacre, massmurder, murder, race extermination, slaughter, slaying